Crystal skull returns and the danger of looking like a caricature

I, like the rest of you, was baffled when I heard that Belize's Institute of Archaeology was suing Disney and Lucasfilm for a cut of the profits from the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (link to Daily Mail story because that is the kind of publication such a story belongs in), along with a call for the skull's return. I keep thinking that there must be some kind of mistake. I want Dean Barrow (prime minister and lawyer) to march down to Jaime Awe's (head of archaeology) office and tell him he's tumbling into crazy land. After all the weird stuff in the news about the McAfee Virus software guy going bonkers and (allegedly) murdering a guy on Ambergris Caye, the last thing Belize needs is a pile of stupid news.

The crystal skull find spot at Lubaantun in 2003

As any archaeologist knows, new-age type stuff appeals to the public. Tourists love it. We all learn to deflect it, to downplay it, to try to be nice, but it looms over an unsettling percentage of conversations we have about our work. The crystal skull is a big thing in Belize and it was even before a new Indiana Jones film. You say "I am an archaeologist" in Belize and some Belizean will bring up the crystal skull. The crystal skull find site has been marked at the Maya site of  Lubaantun for years. You better Belize I found that absurdly delightful!

It is worse to pretend that such a narrative doesn't exist. Trust me, having worked interacting with the public on a VERY mythologized subject, it is better to say "well some people like to think about that, but let me tell you the REAL story! The REAL story is better than fiction". You better darned well be good at making the truth seem great.

Thing is, Awe totally knows the skull is a fake. Seriously, he does. Sure, he wants the skull in Belize to attract tourists to the National Museum (which is a GREAT museum! It is in the old Belize City jail!). Sure he wants some sort of settlement out of Lucasfilm so that the money can be applied to snazzy Belizean conservation of whatever. But by going about it this way, he ends up coming across in the international media as a caricature of a backwards, parochial Caribbean/Central American amateur who is failing comically on a world stage. It totally isn't true! It isn't! But it is what the public wants to believe, so it will go far (think the North Korean "Unicorn Lair" which was a mistranslation and a poor explanation).

But maybe a buzz is what he is after. As anyone who has ever lived in Belize knows, Aldous Huxley once wrote: “If the world has any ends, British Honduras [Belize] would certainly be one of them. It is not on the way from anywhere to anywhere else. It has no strategic value. It is all but uninhabited.” There are fewer people in the country of Belize (which is about the size of Massachusetts) than in my hometown. They really need to attract visitors and they don't have a big international presence. Belize depends on tourism (and it is a GREAT place for a holiday! GO Belize!), so maybe causing a stir is meant to make people think about what ancient mysteries Belize has to offer? Who knows.

Mosquito Coast: I excavated under that.

What does this mean for the repatriation of Cultural Property? Gosh I don't know. Even better, Belize was British Honduras (Colonialism!) when this all went down so even if it was a real artefact, the legality of the removal...oh what a road to go down.

Same spot! No lie! Guy in the red was in the film!

As a personal aside: people in the media have naturally talking about Indiana Jones, Harrison Ford, etc etc. "What would Indiana Jones think?" they ask? You'd have to ask him but I can tell you this. Besides the crystal skull and besides being the inspiration behind the Madonna song 'Isla Bonita', Belizeans are very proud that the film Mosquito Coast, starring Harrison Ford and River Phoenix (in other words, old and young Indy) was filmed there in the mid 1980s. At one point there are some live action pyrotechnics...stuff blows up. Belize it or not, said explosion actually occurred on top of a Maya mound that, in 2003, I helped to excavate. There was a big hole in the side of it from the filming. The irony was not lost on us, I assure you.

Job Announcement: Executive Director of the Lawyers' Committee for Cultural Heritage Preservation

"Art Law" by Alex Nabaum

Hey lawyerly, Heritage NGO, and law-ish sorts: the Lawyers’ Committee for Cultural Heritage Preservation is looking for a new Executive Director to start on Feb 1.

Lawyering background preferred but not required.

Funding is for 15 hours a week at the moment so good to put together with something else you already have going on, but it looks like they want to work towards it being a full time position.

Details here: http://culturalheritagelaw.org/blog?mode=PostView&bmi=1152092

Application Deadline: Dec 21!

Demand for Colonial Bolivian Silver Objects: Melt it down? Sell it on?

Peruvian monstrance, actually
provenanced and provenienced; in the MET

Compiling information on South American church theft is really quite interesting. The legal side was/is quite easy. The objects fall squarely into the cultural patrimony legal framework and the only new¹ bits are working out the idea of private ownership (archaeological objects cannot be 'owned' by individuals, although individuals can possess them with the permission of the state) and sorting out the legal and penal code aspects of clearly defined, textbook theft ². What is new to me is engaging with these types of objects. It has been a long time since I 'learned' a new pantheon of material culture and Colonial church items are certainly new to me.

One issue I have been mulling over is the possibility/probability that any stolen silver object is going to be melted down and sold as, well, silver. There are historic accounts of 19th century looting in Colombia specifically for gold objects to melt down (there wasn't a market for the objects themselves at the time of course) and to this day such things are presented as a possibility. Earlier this week the theft of a modern sculpture, a gold hand stolen from Christies, had everyone chatting about the "they are going to melt it down" fear. It just makes sense, right? In the event that a stolen/looted object is impossible to fence, melt it down and sell the component parts. Coming back to Bolivian ecclesiastical silver, surely it is easier and less risky to unload a lump of melted silver to a silver buyer (of which there are plenty in that part of the Andes for obvious reasons), than it is traffic and/or market a big silver monstrance. It just seems right, yeah?

When this is stolen from a church in Bolivia, it is clear that it is heading to the art market (stolen from the church at San Andres de Machaca, recovered in London and returned)

Looking at preliminary numbers, there do seem to be some patterns within Bolivian church theft. Sometimes people just steal paintings. Sometimes people just steal silver. Sometimes they steal a combo. The times that people just steal silver, they usually pass up other theoretically marketable objects (sculptures, paintings, frames), for the silver objects. It would be quite easy to jump to the conclusion that this is a 'theft for scrap' so to speak: a metal theft rather than a theft to feed the art market. I think that is a bit to simplistic. At this point I am trying to build up an understanding of both supply and demand. Perhaps there is just a strong demand for silver cultural pieces hence the silver-only thefts? Could be. I mean they sure are pretty.

Modern and made in Bolivia

In looking at the demand side online (methodology! methodology!) I came across something quite interesting that I wasn't expecting: the online sale of silver replica crowns, resplendors, etc along-side historic silver pieces.

Say you have purchased a 19th century santo and s/he is lacking the required brilliance, you can order authentic-looking but modern saint accessories (I typed 'holy bling' but deleted it. Oh self-respect!). Even more interesting, these are being presented as "hand-made in Bolivia by Aymara-speaking master craftsmen". So in some insane full-circle, the demand for real-looking Saintly gear for, presumably, old saint statues is giving work to the local craftsperson in the Andes, the descendants of the folks who made the Colonial originals. huh!

There is also clearly a push for people to buy actual old crowns etc. for their saints. Some of the dealers plop an old crown on top of their for-sale sculptures, mention that it isn't the crown that came with the saint, but say it is for sale too. I'm not sure if the new ones are just cheaper, more available, or if they are for those who want to take a moral high ground: working on it. Next, the whole "Aymara-speaking" craftsmen deal might be a lode of silver, so to speak, a marketing ploy that plays into what buyers want to imagine.

But it makes me wonder a few things. Does the market in modern-made Bolivian Saint sparkle mean that the demand for 'real' ones is beyond the supply? There sure seems to be a lot of theft, and some of the pieces clearly do make it to the international market, but is a certain amount of it being caught up in the melting pot, not because of a lack of demand but because of trafficking difficulties?

I will say that it seems like the threat of 'melting down' is the unsubstantiated narrative that seems to accompany all of these pieces...the justification, the story people tell themselves to wiggle out of their own participation in potential criminality. I'll be looking into the reality of 'melting down' as much as possible, simply because it is the basic myth (or 'myth') that underpins this type of object. As usual, we shall see.

<sub>1. New as in new to me which basically means patrimony law as applied to non pre-Conquest material. Plug plug IJCP paper. 

2. Turns out church robbery is automatically aggravated theft, even if there is no weapon or threats to person. That it is the theft of religious objects makes it aggravated in Bolivia and thus puts it into a more penalty-rific sentencing category.</sub>

---
Update: here is an example of what I mean...a historic Mexican piece being offered with a modern Bolivian crown.